<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Brisbane Search Engine Optimization » SEO « Training - Advice - Tools - Resources &#187; algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/tag/algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Google`s Trust Rank and Hilltop Algorithms</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/googles-trust-rank-and-hilltop-algorithms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/googles-trust-rank-and-hilltop-algorithms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 19:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Latest SEO News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithms]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/googles-trust-rank-and-hilltop-algorithms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google`s Trust Rank and Hilltop Algorithms  PageRank is not the only algorithm Google uses to determine relevancy of pages. In this article we discuss two more publicly known algorithms  Hilltop and Trust Rank. Keep reading for some enlightenment on how the world s most popular search engine ranks web sites&#8230;. Automate Software Builds [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.seochat.com/c/a/Google-Optimization-Help/Googles-Trust-Rank-and-Hilltop-Algorithms/ " >Google`s Trust Rank and Hilltop Algorithms </a><br /> PageRank is not the only algorithm Google uses to determine relevancy of pages. In this article we discuss two more publicly known algorithms  Hilltop and Trust Rank. Keep reading for some enlightenment on how the world s most popular search engine ranks web sites&#8230;. <br /><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://rsslinks.industrybrains.com/click?sid=360&#038;scid=10113&#038;rqctid=4194&#038;lid=390081&#038;cid=7795&#038;pr=2&#038;tstamp=20090102000000&#038;url=http://www.kinook.com/VisBuildPro/%3faz%3dph">Automate Software Builds with Visual Build Pro</a> Easily create an automated, repeatable process for building and deploying software. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/googles-trust-rank-and-hilltop-algorithms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Underreported Stories from Search Engine Strategies Chicago 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/underreported-stories-from-search-engine-strategies-chicago-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/underreported-stories-from-search-engine-strategies-chicago-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[advanced]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engine optimization]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Include]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[target audience]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[title]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tool]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/underreported-stories-from-search-engine-strategies-chicago-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Underreported Stories from Search Engine Strategies Chicago 2008          
All week long, I’ve been reporting on the top 10 stories from each day of Search Engine Strategies Chicago 2008.  Generally, they were generated by news coverage of the three keynotes and two Orion Panels, or interviews [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~3/482222337/081211-201409          " >Underreported Stories from Search Engine Strategies Chicago 2008          </a>
<p>All week long, I’ve been reporting on the top 10 stories from each day of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/chicago/">Search Engine Strategies Chicago 2008</a>.  Generally, they were generated by news coverage of the three keynotes and two Orion Panels, or interviews with speakers at the 63 conference sessions.  Hey, that’s just fishing where the fish are.</p>
<p> But there were a couple of other places where I found underreported stories from SES Chicago 2008: SES Magazine, the Expo Hall, the free mini clinics, and the search training workshops.</p>
<p>If you didn’t attend Search Engine Strategies Chicago this year, find someone who did.  And “borrow” his or her copy of SES Magazine.  There is a lot of content in there – beyond the conference information.</p>
<p>For example, there’s an article by Kate Kaye, senior editor of ClickZ News, entitled “Politics 2.0: Political Change Comes to Search, Too.”  It looks at the search marketing tactics that Chicago’s own Barack Obama and his rivals used during the 2008 presidential electiion.  My favorite underreported story is how the campaigns employed search to take advantage of hot topics right away.</p>
<p>If you can’t find someone with a copy of SES Magazine, then check out the interview below with Kate, which appeared back in June.<br /> <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fKHKmI87rMQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fKHKmI87rMQ&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object><br /> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKHKmI87rMQ "><strong>Obama Ads Online: Search Advertising Analysis by Kate Kaye</strong></a></p>
<p>Meanwhile, over at booth #315 in the Expo Hall, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.idealaunch.com/">ideaLaunch</a> was giving demos of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.wordvision.com/">WordVision</a>, its new SEO software tool that uses a complex algorithm to recommend hot keywords to SEO writers.  Yes, that got my attention.  And once this content is uploaded to a website, it tracks the contents’ impact on search engine listings so that SEO managers can understand the overall ROI of content assets.  Yes, that got my attention, too.</p>
<p>But wait!  There’s More!</p>
<p>Over at booth #204, there were a series of free mini clinics.  Tim Ash, the President of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sitetuners.com/">SiteTuners</a>, ran one called, “Your Baby Is Ugly - Landing Page Mini-Critiques.”  David Szetela, the CEO of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.clixmarketing.com/">Clix Marketing</a>, ran another called, “Power PPC Advertising Clinic.”  Jonathan Mendez, Founder and CEO of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.rampdigital.com/">RAMP Digital</a>, ran a third called, “ CPA Optimization Station.”  And Brad Geddes, Founder of <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bgtheory.com/">bgTheory.com</a>, ran a fourth called, “Ad Copy to Landing Page Review.”</p>
<p>In fact, check out what Kurt Scholle, Head Coach of WebAsylum.com, wrote about them at Website-ROI-Guy:<br /> &#8212; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://webasylum.typepad.com/web_asylum_safe_harbor_in/2008/12/i-met-a-rockstar-at-search-engine-strategieschicago.html">I Met a Rockstar at Search Engine Strategies/Chicago</a><br /> &#8212; <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://webasylum.typepad.com/web_asylum_safe_harbor_in/2008/12/your-baby-is-ugly-landing-page-minicritiques-ses-chicago.html">Your Baby Is Ugly - Landing Page Mini-Critiques (SES Chicago)</a></p>
<p>Okay, so maybe the mini clinics weren’t as underreported as SES Magazine and the Expo Hall stories.  But it doesn’t hurt to overreport them, does it?</p>
<p>Finally, there are the six <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.SearchEngineStrategies.com/chicago/training.html">search training workshops</a>, which will be held on Friday, Dec. 12 at the Chicago Hilton.  These include:</p>
<p><strong>Search &#038; Analytics Workshop: Using Analytics to Increase Search Effectiveness</strong> &#8212; Analytics are a gold mine of information, just waiting to be uncovered. The results of campaigns, effectiveness of the website, and the efficiency of your rankings can all be measured with a good analytics program. Unfortunately, many site managers do not make changes to the website without prior measurement, nor do they measure after the changes. As a result, there are many changes to sites that are not based on facts, merely assumptions. Similarly, if changes are not analyzed, then there can be no clear understanding of whether or not improvements made a difference on the site or to the bottom line.</p>
<p><strong>Viral Marketing &#038; Link Baiting</strong> &#8212; Attendees will gain a better understanding of the concepts, ideas and implementations that are required to launch a viral marketing or link baiting campaign. They will learn why the Internet has created a unique environment that allows for rapid, inexpensive word of mouth marketing and how they can harness that environment to promote their own products and services. The workshop will give real life examples of both good and bad viral marketing campaigns and will share insight on how your business can capitalize on your competitor&#8217;s viral disasters. This workshop will also focus on how you can make use of consumer generated media environments like social media outlets, blog marketing, discussion forums and more to both monitor and expand your company&#8217;s online persona. Consumer generated media (the very core of viral marketing) is the fastest growing form of media online today. It&#8217;s only a matter of time until someone online talks about your business. This course will not only help prepare you in the ways to respond to the conversation, it will help you learn how to shape that conversation to your advantage. </p>
<p><strong>Link Building Tactics, Tools &#038; Techniques</strong> &#8212; Need links? In order to rank well and successfully promote your online business, you need an effective link building program as part of your overall SEO strategy. This link building workshop will help you to better understand and manage your link building campaigns by providing you with the knowledge to create proven, practical and creative link marketing campaigns. You&#8217;ll walk away understanding why you need certain links, how to find them, and how to effectively use links to promote your brand and your search engines rankings. </p>
<p><strong>Advanced AdWords </strong>&#8211; This session is broken down into two sections. The first section examines how to effectively use keywords, ad copy, landing pages, and the search and content networks to effectively reach your target audience based upon where consumers are in the buying cycle. The second section will examine different bidding strategies you can employ to maximize your campaign&#8217;s goals. </p>
<p><strong>Search Engine Optimization Workshop</strong> &#8212; A search-engine friendly Web site is a user-friendly, search-friendly, and persuasive site that converts visitors into buyers. In order for a site to be search-engine friendly, it must meet the terms and conditions set forth by the search engines (Google, Yahoo, MSN Search, Ask, etc). Additionally, the site must satisfy the needs of site visitors. Ultimately, the site must be profitable for the Web site owner. Can a single site satisfy all of these groups? This workshop will demonstrate that these skills are essential for building a user-friendly, search-friendly, and persuasive site that converts visitors into buyers.</p>
<p><strong>Optimizing for Universal Search</strong> &#8212; Universal search changes everything! The advent of Google&#8217;s Universal Search has been called &#8220;the most radical change to its search results ever.&#8221; So, how do you take advantage of Google&#8217;s new approach that blends listings from news, maps, video, and image search among those it gathers from web search? This training session will help you get found in all the right places.</p>
<p>The full-day training session is $1,345 and half-day is $745. Register for SES SEM Training at <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/chicago/training.html">http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/chicago/training.html</a>.</p>
<p>Now, I realize that the search training workshops haven&#8217;t even been held yet.  So, it may be premature to call them underreported.  But trust me on this.  Most of the journalists and bloggers who covered SES Chicago 2008 this week have already headed home.  So, I&#8217;m pretty confident predicting that this, too, will be one of the underreported stories from the conference and expo.</p>
<p>Hey, I could be wrong.  As Yogi Berra once said, &#8220;It ain&#8217;t over till it&#8217;s over.&#8221; </p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?a=3x9lO"><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?i=3x9lO" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?a=bWtIO"><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?i=bWtIO" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~4/482222337" height="1" width="1"/>          </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/underreported-stories-from-search-engine-strategies-chicago-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dogpile.com&#8217;s Search &#038; Rescue Program Raises First $100,000 for ASPCA</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/dogpilecoms-search-rescue-program-raises-first-100000-for-aspca/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/dogpilecoms-search-rescue-program-raises-first-100000-for-aspca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/dogpilecoms-search-rescue-program-raises-first-100000-for-aspca/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dogpile.com&#8217;s Search &#038; Rescue Program Raises First $100,000 for ASPCA          
Dogpile.com searchers have raised $100,000 for the Search &#038; Rescue Program, a philanthropic arm that donates money to animal-related charities. The program is on its way to reaching its goal of raising $1 million for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sewblog/~3/472740109/081202-133010          " >Dogpile.com&#8217;s Search &#038; Rescue Program Raises First $100,000 for ASPCA          </a>
<p>Dogpile.com searchers have raised $100,000 for the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.dogpile.com/rescue">Search &#038; Rescue Program</a>, a philanthropic arm that donates money to animal-related charities. The program is on its way to reaching its goal of raising $1 million for the ASPCA by the end of 2009.</p>
<p>“Whether people are using Dogpile.com for their online holiday shopping or just for general information searches, the traffic to the site has helped us raise a significant amount for the ASPCA already,” said Stacy Ybarra, senior director of corporate giving, InfoSpace. “Search and Rescue allows any individual with access to a computer to support a worthy cause without significantly changing their habits or spending a penny of their own money.”</p>
<p>Related Reading:<br /> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080805-112045">Dogpile.com and Petfinder.com Agree to Search Partnership (Plus, Tell Us Your Pet Story!)</a><br /> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080619-103121">Dogpile.com Releases a Searcher&#8217;s Best Friend, a Desktop Widget</a><br /> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080424-084455">Dogpile.com Updates Search Algorithm, Design and Content</a></p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?a=fnSPO"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?i=fnSPO" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?a=VbojO"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?i=VbojO" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sewblog/~4/472740109" height="1" width="1"/>          </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/dogpilecoms-search-rescue-program-raises-first-100000-for-aspca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google CEO Calls Internet &#8220;Cesspool&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/google-ceo-calls-internet-cesspool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/google-ceo-calls-internet-cesspool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithms]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[quality content]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[relevance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/google-ceo-calls-internet-cesspool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google CEO Calls Internet &#8220;Cesspool&#8221;          
Google CEO Eric Schmidt must love controversy. In a speech to magazine executives Wednesday he called the internet &#8220;a cesspool&#8221;, AdAge reported.
I don&#8217;t know if that makes Google a sewerage company, but I think Schmidt should realize that many look at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sewblog/~3/416217710/081009-180111          " >Google CEO Calls Internet &#8220;Cesspool&#8221;          </a>
<p>Google CEO Eric Schmidt must love controversy. In a speech to magazine executives Wednesday he called the internet &#8220;a cesspool&#8221;, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=131569">AdAge reported</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if that makes Google a sewerage company, but I think Schmidt should realize that many look at Google as their filter to the web. Employees like Matt Cutts spend all their time working on &#8216;purifying&#8217; the results, to expect publishers to be the answer may not be the right approach.</p>
<p>Criticizing opponents to the Yahoo-Google ad deal may not be a smart move given the recent drop in value of the once &#8220;golden child&#8221; of the web. Schmidt challenged &#8220;if you are going to criticize us, criticize us properly.&#8221; Claiming ad prices would not increase under the Google Yahoo ad deal.</p>
<p>Schmidt displayed a certain amount of callous aloofness when he avoided questions about how publishers could improve their ranking with Google.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;&#8221;We don&#8217;t actually want you to be successful,&#8221; he said. The company&#8217;s algorithms are trying to find the most relevant search results, after all, not the sites that best game the system. &#8220;The fundamental way to increase your rank is to increase your relevance,&#8221; he added&#8221; AdAge reported.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you call the web a cesspool but do not offer insights to quality content providers who pay money to provide professional journalism I don&#8217;t think you are serious about cleaning it up, so much as taunting an economically challenged industry.</p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?a=mujKM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?i=mujKM" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?a=NWBzM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?i=NWBzM" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sewblog/~4/416217710" height="1" width="1"/>          </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/google-ceo-calls-internet-cesspool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEW Experts: Could Social Media Be the Google Killer?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/sew-experts-could-social-media-be-the-google-killer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/sew-experts-could-social-media-be-the-google-killer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 04:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/sew-experts-could-social-media-be-the-google-killer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEW Experts: Could Social Media Be the Google Killer?          
Much discussion has been made of where the David to the Google Goliath will come from. In today&#8217;s SEM Crossfire column, &#8220;Could Social Media Be the Google Killer?,&#8221; Frank Watson and Chris Boggs wonder if the ongoing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~3/397330203/080919-000002          " >SEW Experts: Could Social Media Be the Google Killer?          </a>
<p><img src="http://searchenginewatch.com/_imgs/authors/watson_frank.jpg" alt="Search Engine Watch Expert - Frank Watson" style="border: 1px solid #666666" height="70" width="70" hspace="5" vspace="5" align="left"><img src="http://searchenginewatch.com/_imgs/authors/boggs_chris.jpg" alt="Search Engine Watch Expert - Chris Boggs" style="border: 1px solid #666666" height="70" width="70" hspace="5" vspace="5" align="right">Much discussion has been made of where the David to the Google Goliath will come from. In today&#8217;s <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://searchenginewatch.com/sew_experts/sem_crossfire">SEM Crossfire</a> column, &#8220;<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://searchenginewatch.com/3630907">Could Social Media Be the Google Killer?</a>,&#8221; Frank Watson and Chris Boggs wonder if the ongoing growth of social media may indicate that we should look beyond a Yahoo-Microsoft merger and other algorithmic-based search engines and explore the possibility of search becoming less important. </p>
<p><font style="font-weight: bold; color:#D1E0F0">&raquo;</font> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3630907"><font style="color:#336699">Full story</font></a> </p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?a=B2rRL"><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?i=B2rRL" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?a=OMEzL"><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?i=OMEzL" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~4/397330203" height="1" width="1"/>          </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/sew-experts-could-social-media-be-the-google-killer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Discusses Search Evaluation Process</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/google-discusses-search-evaluation-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/google-discusses-search-evaluation-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Include]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[queries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[relevance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search quality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[title]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/google-discusses-search-evaluation-process/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Discusses Search Evaluation Process          
Google had been doing a series of posts about search quality. Today, the latest post in the series discusses how evaluation enters into the the process.
Scott Huffman, Engineering Director, gave four insights into the nuances of difficulty experienced in search evaluation:

First, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~3/394306060/080916-110700          " >Google Discusses Search Evaluation Process          </a>
<p>Google had been doing a series of posts about search quality. Today, the latest post in the series discusses how evaluation enters into the the process.</p>
<p>Scott Huffman, Engineering Director, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/search-evaluation-at-google.html">gave four insights</a> into the nuances of difficulty experienced in search evaluation:</p>
<blockquote><ul>
<li><strong>First, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080717-123704">understanding what a user really wants when they type a query</a> &#8212; the query&#8217;s &#8220;intent&#8221; &#8212; can be very difficult.</strong> For highly navigational queries like [ebay] or [orbitz], we can guess that most users want to navigate to the respective sites. But how about [olympics]? Does the user want news, medal counts from the recent Beijing games, the IOC&#8217;s homepage, historical information about the games, &#8230; ? This same exact question, of course, is faced by our ranking and search UI teams. Evaluation is the other side of that coin.</li>
<li><strong>Second, comparing the quality of search engines (whether Google versus our competitors, Google versus Google a month ago) is never black and white.</strong> It&#8217;s essentially impossible to make a change that is 100% positive in all situations; with any algorithmic change you make to search, many searches will get better and some will get worse.</li>
<li><strong>Third, there are several dimensions to &#8220;good&#8221; results.</strong> Traditional search evaluation has focused on the relevance of the results, and of course that is our highest priority as well. But today&#8217;s search-engine users expect more than just relevance. Are the results fresh and timely? Are they from authoritative sources? Are they comprehensive? Are they free of spam? Are their titles and snippets descriptive enough? Do they include additional UI elements a user might find helpful for the query (maps, images, query suggestions, etc.)? Our evaluations attempt to cover each of these dimensions where appropriate.</li>
<li><strong>Fourth, evaluating Google search quality requires covering an enormous breadth.</strong> We cover over a hundred locales (country/language pairs) with in-depth evaluation. Beyond locales, we support search quality teams working on many different kinds of queries and features. For example, we explicitly measure the quality of Google&#8217;s spelling suggestions, universal search results, image and video searches, related query suggestions, stock oneboxes, and many, many more.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>Not sure if I&#8217;m buying that Olympics example. Google didn&#8217;t do a great job with the Beijing Olympics, and surely their algorithm could handle serving up more relevant search results during the time surrounding the event. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that search query intent evaluation is easy, just that the Olympics query is not quite as problematic as Google is making it out to be.</p>
<p>The rest of the points are things we&#8217;ve been hearing from Google for a long time. We know they&#8217;re progressing on universal and personalization search efforts, all in their famous intent to create the best user experience.</p>
<p>So, what methods does Google employ to address these evaluations? Huffman offered up the following:</p>
<blockquote><ul>
<li><strong>Human evaluators.</strong> Google makes use of evaluators in many countries and languages. These evaluators are carefully trained and are asked to evaluate the quality of search results in several different ways. We sometimes show evaluators whole result sets by themselves or &#8220;side by side&#8221; with alternatives; in other cases, we show evaluators a single result at a time for a query and ask them to rate its quality along various dimensions.</li>
<li><strong>Live traffic experiments.</strong> We also make use of experiments, in which small fractions of queries are shown results from alternative search approaches. <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/080827-111438">Ben Gomes talked about how we make use of these experiments for testing search UI elements in his previous post</a>. With these experiments, we are able to see real users&#8217; reactions (clicks, etc.) to alternative results.</li>
<ul></blockquote>
<p>What do you think of Google&#8217;s search evaluation? What evaluations would you like to see them conduct? Discuss in the comments. </p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?a=Q9V9L"><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?i=Q9V9L" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?a=vM0oL"><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?i=vM0oL" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~4/394306060" height="1" width="1"/>          </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/google-discusses-search-evaluation-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Searching Rich Media at TechCrunch50</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/searching-rich-media-at-techcrunch50/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/searching-rich-media-at-techcrunch50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Include]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[queries]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[relevance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[text]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/searching-rich-media-at-techcrunch50/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Searching Rich Media at TechCrunch50          
Video search has been a key topic at the TechCrunch50 show in San Francisco. Lots of newly launched companies presented (kind of like DEMO minus the payola). In a “rich media” grouping of companies, the proverbial challenge of making images and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sewblog/~3/389880288/080911-141516          " >Searching Rich Media at TechCrunch50          </a>
<p>Video search has been a key topic at the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.techcrunch50.com/2008/conference/index.php">TechCrunch50</a> show in San Francisco. Lots of newly launched companies presented (kind of like DEMO minus the payola). In a “rich media” grouping of companies, the proverbial challenge of making images and video searchable kept coming up. </p>
<p>Presenting companies were<br /> •	<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.techcrunch50.com/2008/conference/presenter.php?presenter=78">VideoSurf</a>: video search <br /> •	<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.techcrunch50.com/2008/conference/presenter.php?presenter=79">GazoPa</a>:  image search <br /> •	<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.techcrunch50.com/2008/conference/presenter.php?presenter=80">Fotonauts</a>: image search <br /> •	<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.techcrunch50.com/2008/conference/presenter.php?presenter=81">Bojam</a>: online music collaboration (like garage band in the cloud) </p>
<p>On the panel of judges was Bradley Horowitz who was a key part of Yahoo’s acquisition of Flickr back in 2005. Now he in charge of Google Gadgets and recently oversaw the <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/02/picasa-refresh-brings-facial-recognition/">integration</a> of facial recognition software in Picassa.</p>
<p>“For a number of years I worked at MIT on image recognition technology and the first time I saw Flickr, I wanted to rip up my diploma,” he said from the stage. “It turns out humans are very good at this. You don’t need a hyper-technical solution. It can sometimes be the activity around the video, not the content in the video that defines relevance. </p>
<p>This point underscores many of the companies walking different lines between algorithmic solutions and user interaction/tagging in order to solve this longstanding indexing issue. </p>
<p>For the sake brevity, I’ll just talk about the best one I saw &#8212; San Mateo, Calif based video search engine VideoSurf. CEO Lior Delgo agrees that users should be brought into the mix but asserts that relying on this alone is flawed. </p>
<p>The company still got Horowitz’ vote for its underlying technology, which includes a great deal of intellectual property around visual recognition. This is paired with some social features that together make it a viable choice for video search over and above existing engines like Truveo and Blinkx. </p>
<p>The technology essentially goes beyond the voice recognition, meta data, and surrounding content that many existing sites rely on, and instead tags each frame with more granular information. This includes character names in popular shows and other things that are more contextually relevant and likely as search terms.  Relevancy is weighed on frequency of these keywords, click throughs and a few other factors. </p>
<p>This could also be the right time for this technology, given the expanding corpus of video being brought online. This isn’t just the long tail YouTube ranks but head content that will get more search queries such as network shows on sites like Hulu. Lots more to the nuts and bolts, and it’s clear video search will continue to be a tough nut to crack. But this will be one to watch. </p>
<p>I hope to dive deeper in a column later this month on this and the many other search related companies here &#8212; including a social network for bird watchers (seriously). </p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?a=LnzSL"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?i=LnzSL" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?a=FpEgL"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/sewblog?i=FpEgL" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sewblog/~4/389880288" height="1" width="1"/>          </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/searching-rich-media-at-techcrunch50/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sugarrae: Google Pushed Twitter To NoFollow All Links?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/sugarrae-google-pushed-twitter-to-nofollow-all-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/sugarrae-google-pushed-twitter-to-nofollow-all-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[link popularity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[popularity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/sugarrae-google-pushed-twitter-to-nofollow-all-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sugarrae: Google Pushed Twitter To NoFollow All Links?          
While the rest of the world was distracted by the launch of Chrome, Sugarrae aka Rae Hoffman - definitely a woman who &#8220;pulls rank&#8221; - was covering the nofollowing of links over at Twitter at the behest of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~3/383597212/080904-170959          " >Sugarrae: Google Pushed Twitter To NoFollow All Links?          </a>
<p>While the rest of the world was distracted by the launch of Chrome, Sugarrae aka Rae Hoffman - definitely a woman who &#8220;pulls rank&#8221; - was covering <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sugarrae.com/twitter-lays-down-for-google/">the nofollowing of links over at Twitter</a> at the behest of Google.</p>
<p>Her argument is powerful and once again challenges Google for pushing sites to do what they want. As she asks:<br />
<blockquote> &#8220;If Google is the one who wants that web link nofollowed because some twitter profile pages may be automated bots or spammers, then it is time they realize that THEY are responsible for determining which of those individual pages is authoritative, trusted and legitimate enough to pass link popularity, by a method other than demanding that other websites and social networks change the ways they do business to help Google stop links being used as a form of currency and to manipulate their algorithm - an issue Google and Google alone created and profited from.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>This should be read by everyone in our industry. Leave the shiny new browser alone for a few minutes and see where our futures are going. Thanks for not being distracted by Chrome.</p>
<div class="feedflare"> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?a=jkNBVL"><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?i=jkNBVL" border="0"></img></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?a=apuC4L"><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~f/sewblog?i=apuC4L" border="0"></img></a> </div>
<p><img src="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~4/383597212" height="1" width="1"/>          </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/sugarrae-google-pushed-twitter-to-nofollow-all-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 Simple Search Engine Optimization Strategies Guaranteed To Increase Your Rankings</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/6-simple-search-engine-optimization-strategies-guaranteed-to-increase-your-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/6-simple-search-engine-optimization-strategies-guaranteed-to-increase-your-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Basic SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithms]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[keyword density]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[keyword phrase]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[keyword phrases]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[major search engines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[optimization strategies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[relevance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimisation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to see your website dancing at the top of the Google rankings for your keyword phrases or your niche? Yes, it is possible. Simply read on to find out&#8230;
Google, MSN, and Yahoo all use their own methodologies and/or algorithms to calculate the relevance of your pages, but here are a few common factors that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to see your website dancing at the top of the Google rankings for your keyword phrases or your niche? Yes, it is possible. Simply read on to find out&#8230;<span id="more-44"></span></p>
<p>Google, MSN, and Yahoo all use their own methodologies and/or algorithms to calculate the relevance of your pages, but here are a few common factors that are accepted by most to guarantee good rankings in renowned search engines.</p>
<p>Analyze your pages, and start the process today; remember to resubmit your changes when you are done, and the traffic will start to flow.</p>
<p>1) Keyword Density</p>
<p>Try to achieve a 3.5% to 7% keyword density for each of your pages. This means, your keywords should get repeated 3 to 7 times per 100 words written. However, do NOT overuse your keywords on the same page. Related keywords may help further.</p>
<p>There was a time when random usage of keywords was accepted by major search engines. This led to utter chaos and visitors hardly got to read what they were looking for. This was brought to the notice of search engine webmasters and it changed the rules overnight. Today, it is considered spam and the offender is punishable by law.</p>
<p>2) Keyword Phrase Choices</p>
<p>It is next to impossible to get a high rank for a single keyword, so make sure you aim for some lower-demand phrases too. The keyword &#8216;coffee&#8217; has been listed in Overture as getting searched 370830 times a month. &#8216;Coffee&#8217; as a keyword has an immense competition. However, a key phrase like &#8216;coffee club&#8217; shows just 1813 searches. Getting a number one rank for coffee would of course be wonderful, but having a moderately good rank for several lower-demand keywords must be an essential part of your search engine optimization strategies.</p>
<p>3) Original Content</p>
<p>Google can penalize websites that offer exactly the same content, and this can result in lower ranking for all sites. In extreme situations, the website may be written off from the search engine forever. How many times have you seen multiple sites meant to promote the same old resale rights product? All of them display the same old sales page. The cleverest thing for you to do would be to simply rewrite the sales letter and submit that page to the search engines. This is vitally important SEO tip. Make sure you put in connected words and phrases; not simply the targeted keywords. Originality always sells. And it sells more than any other strategy ever used.</p>
<p>4) Linking Right</p>
<p>Make sure all your links use proper text. How many times have you seen &#8220;click here to visit&#8221; on a website? Simply changing the link text will cause your page to rank higher in all the search engines. You may also select connected phrases as link text. An interesting text link raises the visitor&#8217;s curiosity and increases the value expectation of the product.</p>
<p>5) Repetition of Key words and Phrases</p>
<p>Do ensure that the key phrases and keywords that you select appear multiple times in every one of your paragraphs and the entire content as a whole. Remember to put in connected phrases and keywords to help give a boost to your SEO. Do not let yourself get attracted to keyword stuffing which is the other name for indiscriminate repetition of the same keywords again and again.</p>
<p>5) Update yourself by visiting SEO news sites to stay in tune with the latest trends. The engines keep on shuffling their formulae and strategies so you can do good to get yourself updated on the latest news.</p>
<p>6) Alt Tags</p>
<p>When adding a picture or an image to your webpages you must add connected key phrases and words to the alt tags. Taking this simple step helps in boosting your PR.</p>
<p>Reviewing your site from time to time, implementing the necessary changes, and keeping abreast of the newest trends in Search Engine Optimization will definitely ensure your site achieves a top ranking for your chosen keywords and key phrases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/6-simple-search-engine-optimization-strategies-guaranteed-to-increase-your-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What On Earth Is A Search Engine Algorithm?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/what-on-earth-is-a-search-engine-algorithm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/what-on-earth-is-a-search-engine-algorithm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Basic SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[relevance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[robot]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[search engine algorithm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web pages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Each search engine has something called an algorithm which is the formula that each search engine uses to evaluate web pages and determine their relevance and value when crawling them for possible inclusion in their search engine. A crawler is the robot that browses all of these pages for the search engine.
The GOOGLE Algorithm Is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Each search engine has something called an algorithm which is the formula that each search engine uses to evaluate web pages and determine their relevance and value when crawling them for possible inclusion in their search engine. A crawler is the robot that browses all of these pages for the search engine.<span id="more-43"></span></p>
<p>The GOOGLE Algorithm Is Key</p>
<p>Google has a comprehensive and highly developed technology, a straightforward interface and a wide-ranging array of search tools which enable the users to easily access a variety of information online.</p>
<p>Google users can browse the web and find information in various languages, retrieve maps, stock quotes and read news, search for a long lost friend using the phonebook listings available on Google for all of US cities and basically surf the 3 billion odd web pages on the internet!</p>
<p>Google boasts of having world’s largest archive of Usenet messages, dating all the way back to 1981. Google’s technology can be accessed from any conventional desktop PC as well as from various wireless platforms such as WAP and i-mode phones, handheld devices and other such Internet equipped gadgets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimization-seo.com.au/what-on-earth-is-a-search-engine-algorithm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
